안녕하세요, 서울에 거주하는 18년차 소프트웨어 엔지니어 [홍민희]입니다.

[집안 사정]으로 일을 쉰 지 1년이 되었고, 이제 슬슬 재취업을 하려고 합니다. 1년을 쉰 만큼 이번 취업은 소프트웨어 엔지니어로서 재활을 큰 목표로 두고 있습니다. 자세한 제 소개는 [이력서]를 참고해 주세요.

제가 선호하는 업무 환경은 다음과 같습니다.

• 프로그래밍 언어 및 플랫폼: 오래되고 검증된 Java 같은 플랫폼도 물론 좋습니다만, Rust나 Haskell처럼 비교적 최신의 PLT 연구가 반영되어 있는 언어도 즐겨 사용합니다. 비교적 능숙한 언어로는 Haskell, TypeScript, Python, C# 정도가 있고, 다른 언어라도 필요하다면 배워서 써야겠지요.

1. Edit the file at /Library/Backblaze.bzpkg/bzdata/bzexcluderules_editable.xml.
2. Add these rules inside the bzexclusions tag:

<!-- Exclude node_modules. -->
<excludefname_rule plat="mac" osVers="*"  ruleIsOptional="t" skipFirstCharThenStartsWith="users/" contains_1="/node_modules/" contains_2="*" doesNotContain="*" endsWith="*" hasFileExtension="*" />
<excludefname_rule plat="mac" osVers="*"  ruleIsOptional="t" skipFirstCharThenStartsWith="users/" contains_1="/.git/" contains_2="*" doesNotContain="*" endsWith="*" hasFileExtension="*" />

Hence, if you are interested in existing applications to "just work" without the need for adjustments, then you may be better off avoiding Wayland.

Wayland solves no issues I have but breaks almost everything I need. Even the most basic, most simple things (like xkill) - in this case with no obvious replacement. And usually it stays broken, because the Wayland folks mostly seem to care about Automotive, Gnome, maybe KDE - and alienating everyone else (e.g., people using just an X11 window manager or something like GNUstep) in the process.

Wayland proponents make it seem like Wayland is "the successor" of Xorg, when in fact it is not. It is merely an incompatible alternative, and not even one that has (nor wants to have) feature parity (missing features). And unlike X11 (the X Window System), Wayland protocol designers actively avoid the concept of "windows" (making up incompr

The user experience of Python on a minimal Debian or Ubuntu installation is bad. Core features like virtual environments, pip bootstrapping, and the ssl module are either missing or do not work like designed and documented. Some Python core developers including me are worried and consider Debian/Ubuntu's packaging harmful for Python's reputation and branding. Users don't get what they expect.

The problems can be easily reproduced with official Debian and Ubuntu containers in Docker or Podman. Debian Stable (Debian 10 Buster) comes with Python 3.7.3. Ubuntu Focal (20.04 LTS) has Python 3.8.5.